GROSS v. BOROUGH OF NEPTUNE CITY


875 A.2d 251 (2005)

378 N.J. Super. 155

Danielle GROSS, Petitioner-Respondent, v. BOROUGH OF NEPTUNE CITY, Respondent-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 10, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Connell, Connell & Camassa, Manasquan, for appellant (Ronald S. Yuro, of counsel; R. Peter Connell and Mr. Yuro, on the brief).

Shebell & Shebell, Ocean Tp., for respondent (Danielle S. Chandonnet, on the brief).

Before Judges STERN, COBURN and WECKER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

COBURN, J.A.D.

An administrative regulation governing discovery in workers' compensation cases requires the employer to disclose in the pre-trial memorandum its intent to offer at trial any surveillance videotapes or films of the employee. The primary question presented by this case is whether the employer can avoid its obligation of notification by delaying surveillance without special justification until after the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases