1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 621 S.E.2d
  5. 621 S.E.2d 487 (2005)
 

MATEEN v. DICUS

No. A05A1372.

621 S.E.2d 487 (2005)

275 Ga. App. 742

MATEEN et al. v. DICUS.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Reconsideration Denied October 6, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Suraiya A. Mateen, pro se.

Roohi F. Faiyaz, pro se.

Reema Mohammedi, pro se.

Richard J. Capriola, Sharon M. Lewonski, Weinstock & Scavo, P.C., Atlanta, for Appellee.

MIKELL, Judge.

Pro se appellants Suraiya A. Mateen, Roohi Fatima Faiyaz, and Reema Mohammedi appeal the $689,690 judgment entered against them in this fraudulent conveyance action. We affirm. The relevant facts follow.

Appellants are the wife and daughters of Mohammad Faiyaz, who agreed to purchase a dry cleaning business from appellee Frank Dicus in 1996 for $380,000. Faiyaz made a $100,000 down payment and signed promissory notes for the remainder. After...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases