STATE v. JANOWSKI


866 A.2d 229 (2005)

375 N.J. Super. 1

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael JANOWSKI, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 8, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph L. Bocchini, Jr., Mercer County Prosecutor, attorney for appellant (Matthew Regulski, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief).

Lewis, Wood & Brown, Trenton, attorneys for respondent (Thomas E. Brown, on the brief).

Before Judges CONLEY, BRAITHWAITE and WINKELSTEIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

BRAITHWAITE, J.A.D.

The State appeals, by leave granted, from an order suppressing the out-of-court photographic identification of defendant Michael Janowski because the set of computerized photographs from which defendant was identified by the victim was not preserved and recorded. The State contends that the motion judge erroneously interpreted existing law and that the automatic

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases