1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 201 S.W.3d
  5. 201 S.W.3d 890 (2005)
 

ECHOLS v. STATE

Nos. CR 94-928, CR 99-1060.

201 S.W.3d 890 (2005)

Damien ECHOLS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Arkansas, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

Supplemental Opinion of Rehearing Denied February 24, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis P. Riordan, Donald M. Morgan, and Theresa A. Gibosno, San Francisco, CA; and Cauley, Bowman, Carney & Williams, by: Deborah R. Sallings, Little Rock, for petitioner.

Mandell & Wright, L.L.P., (Houston) by: Edward A. Mallett; and Alvin Schay (Little Rock), for petitioner on rehearing.

Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by: David R. Raupp, Sr. Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, for respondent.

TOM GLAZE, Justice.

This case was first decided on March 19, 1994, when a jury found petitioner Damien Echols guilty of brutally murdering three eight-year-old boys in West Memphis on May 5, 1993. Echols appealed these capital murder convictions, and this court, on December 23, 1996, in a 77-page opinion in appellate case number CR94-928, affirmed that conviction. See Echols v. State, 326 Ark. 917, 936 S.W...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases