1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 887 A.2d
  5. 887 A.2d 203 (2005)
 

NASCIMENTO v. KING

887 A.2d 203 (2005)

381 N.J. Super. 593

Luis M. NASCIMENTO and Monica Pegado, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Mary KING and Richard King, Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 15, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph P. LaSala argued the cause for appellants (McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, attorneys; Mr. LaSala, of counsel; Joshua A. Zielinski, Morristown, on the brief).

Jeffrey Campisi argued the cause for defendants (Sharkey & Campisi, attorneys; Gregory G. Campisi, Roseland, of counsel; Jeffrey Campisi, on the brief).

Before Judges COBURN, LISA and S.L. REISNER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

S.L. REISNER, J.A.D.

This case presents an issue of substantial compliance with the requirement that a demand for a trial de novo, following nonbinding arbitration, be served within thirty days after the arbitration award. R. 4:21A-6(b)(1). The trial court confirmed an arbitration award in plaintiffs' favor, based on a finding that defendants' counsel failed to serve plaintiffs' counsel with a copy of the demand...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases