STATE v. N.G.


886 A.2d 186 (2005)

381 N.J. Super. 352

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. N.G., Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 28, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Garces & Grabler, attorneys for appellant (Christopher G. Hewitt and John D. Caruso, on the brief).

Peter C. Harvey, Attorney General, attorney for respondent (Adrienne B. Reim, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges CONLEY, WEISSBARD and WINKELSTEIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

WINKELSTEIN, J.A.D.

Defendant, N.G., appeals from his eight-year sentence to the Adult Diagnostic and Treatment Center (ADTC). To sentence a defendant to the ADTC, a judge must find that the defendant's offending conduct was characterized by a pattern of repetitive, compulsive behavior. See N.J.S.A. 2C:47-1 to -10 (the Act). On appeal, defendant's primary argument is that the Act is unconstitutionally vague...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases