1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 403 F.Supp.2d
  5. 403 F.Supp.2d 669 (2005)
 

NEOPOST INDUSTRIE B.V. v. PFE INTERN., INC.

No. 04 C 5047.

403 F.Supp.2d 669 (2005)

NEOPOST INDUSTRIE B.V., Neopost, Inc., Neopost S.A., and Hasler, Inc. Plaintiffs, v. PFE INTERNATIONAL, INC. and Pfe International Limited, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

December 5, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lynn Hagman Murray, Gary M. Miller, Mark H. Carnow, Peter S. Roeser, Grippo & Elden, Chicago, IL, Donald J. Ranft, Matthew C. Wagner, Philip J. Miolene, Collen Law Associates, P.C., Ossining, NY, for Plaintiffs.

Patrick A. Fleming, John F. Shonkwiler, Novack & Macey LLP, Allison Michelle Dudley, Charles Cobey Kinne, Michael Joseph H. Baniak, Baniak, Pine & Gannon, Chicago, IL, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CASTILLO, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Neopost Industrie B.V., Neopost, Inc., Neopost S.A, and Hasler, Inc. (collectively, "Neopost") sued PFE International, Inc., and PFE International Limited (collectively, "PFE") alleging that PFE's production and marketing of certain mail assembly and processing products violate certain of Neopost's Patents and trademarks. Neopost alleges that two PFE machines — the Minimailer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases