1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 113 P.3d
  5. 113 P.3d 952 (2005)
 

COUSSENS v. STEVENS

032118; A123633.

113 P.3d 952 (2005)

200 Or. App. 165

Robert J. COUSSENS and Susan Jean Coussens, cotrustees of the Robert J. Coussens Revocable Trust U/A dated July 11, 2002; Jack A. Erickson; Contractors, Inc., an Oregon corporation; Michael Burmeister-Brown; Susan Burmeister-Brown; Robert L. Bailey; Barbara S. Bailey; Linda A. Hutchins, Trustee of the Linda A. Hutchins Revocable Trust u/a/d 8/16/93; Michael Thayer; Byron E. Thompson, M. Patricia Thompson; William B. Boone; Madeline F. Boone and the William B. Boone and Madeline F. Boone Trusts; Barbara B. Gray; Michael S. Gray; Claudia S. Gray; Scott Donald Gray; Steven John Gray; Jodith M. Teetz; Allen K. Bechtel; Janet Lynn Bechtel; Virginia Burns; Robert S. Burns; Linda Burns; George P. Kane and Shirley K. Kane, Trustees of the George P. Kane Living Trust and the Shirley K. Kane Living Trust; Patrick C. Hegrenes And Patricia J. Hegrenes, husband and wife; Barbara J. McMinn; Racker Investment, LLC; Shoaib Tareen; Catherine A. Silgas; Elaine Lucretia Murphy; William L. McCormack; Darlene T. McCormack, trustees; W.L. McCormack and D.T. McCormack, Trusts u/a/d 5/11/98; Donald A. Kessler; Marilyn M. Kessler; Kenneth L. White; Ann O. White; Reiersdale Development Inc.; Florence T. Dolan; Patrick L. Radecki; Linda Ann Radecki; Catherine Brands; Elizabeth Brands; Julianne Brands; Julie E. Brands; David C. Brands; John G. Connors; and Kathy M. Connors, Respondents, v. Irving P. STEVENS and Jeanette E. Stevens, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 15, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Stephens argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Groen Stephens & Klinge LLP.

James N. Westwood, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Amy Edwards and Stoel Rives LLP.

Before LINDER, Presiding Judge, and HASELTON and ORTEGA, Judges.

HASELTON, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment quieting title in plaintiffs to a strip of land between Ocean Avenue and the ordinary high tide line of the Pacific Ocean in the City of Cannon Beach. Defendants assign error to the trial court's allowance of plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, arguing that plaintiffs failed to prove the strength of their titles because, inter alia, the relevant plat map establishes Ocean Avenue as the western boundary of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases