PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his convictions for reckless endangerment, ORS 163.195, arguing that the trial court erred in failing to determine that his waiver of his right to counsel was knowing and voluntary. The state concedes that the record does not establish that defendant's waiver of his right to counsel was knowing and voluntary. Upon review of the record, we find the state's concession to be well founded. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.
In
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.