1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 887 A.2d
  5. 887 A.2d 159 (2005)
 

AGURTO v. GUHR

887 A.2d 159 (2005)

381 N.J. Super. 519

Jose AGURTO and Scherazade Agurto, his wife, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Valer GUHR, Defendant-Respondent, and Special Machinery Corp., Baker Adhesive Company, Defendants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 9, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terrence Smith, East Hanover, argued the cause for appellants (Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, attorneys; Marc C. Saperstein, Teaneck, and Mr. Smith, on the brief).

Jeffrey W. Mazzola, New York, NY, argued the cause for respondent (William E. Staehle, attorney; Mr. Mazzola, on the brief).

Before Judges COBURN, LISA and S.L. REISNER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

S.L. REISNER, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, an employee of Baker Adhesive Co., was seriously injured when his arm was drawn into a glue mixing machine that Baker had bought from defendant Valer Guhr. Plaintiff sued Guhr under the Product Liability Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:58C-1 to -11, contending that Guhr was a product seller who was strictly liable for any defect in the mixing machine. The trial judge granted Guhr's motion for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases