1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 122 P.3d
  5. 122 P.3d 922 (2005)
 

TOPLIFF v. CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY,

No. 23875-0-III.

122 P.3d 922 (2005)

James F. TOPLIFF and Deborah (Debbie) Topliff, individually and the marital community thereof, v. CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Special Panel.

November 15, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Edward Huntington, Richter-Wimberley PS, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

Kelly Patrick Corr, Mark Bradley Tuvim, Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner & Pree, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

BROWN, J.

¶ 1 The State insurance commissioner received service papers for a suit against Chicago Insurance Company (CIC), but failed to notify CIC. This led to a default judgment by plaintiffs, James Topliff and Deborah Topliff that the trial court vacated for extraordinary circumstances under CR 60(b)(11). The Topliffs' contend, despite the lack of notice to CIC that they were properly served under RCW 48.05.200. We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases