COX v. MULLIGAN

No. 30940.

128 P.3d 893 (2005)

142 Idaho 356

Lloyd E. COX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Valorie L. MULLIGAN and Charles Cates, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Twin Falls, November 2005 Term.

Rehearing Denied February 9, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Parsons, Smith & Stone, Burley, for appellant. William A. Parsons argued.

Montgomery Law Offices and Wilbur T. Nelson, Boise, for respondents. Wilbur T. Nelson argued.


EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from the district court's refusal to award the prevailing plaintiff attorney fees pursuant to Idaho Code § 12-120(4). We reverse the district court and award attorney fees on appeal.

I. ANALYSIS

While driving a car owned by Charles Cates, Valorie Mulligan collided with the rear of Lloyd Cox's car, injuring him. He sued Ms. Mulligan and Mr. Cates, and the jury awarded him $2,287.05 in special damages and $6...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases