1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 365 S.C.
  5. 365 S.C. 650 (2005)
 

BYRD v. CITY OF HARTSVILLE

No. 26040.

365 S.C. 650 (2005)

620 S.E.2d 76

Phelix BYRD, Appellant, v. The CITY OF HARTSVILLE and Darlington County, Defendants, Of which The City of Hartsville is Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided September 19, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles S. Altman, of Finkel & Altman, of Charleston, for Appellant.

David L. Morrison and Andrew F. Lindemann, both of Davidson, Morrison & Lindemann, of Columbia, and Martin S. Driggers, of Driggers & Moyd, of Hartsville, for Respondent.

Justice PLEICONES:

This is an inverse-condemnation case. Appellant Phelix Byrd (Byrd) appeals from the circuit court's grant of summary judgment for Respondent City of Hartsville (the City). We certified the case pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR. We affirm.

FACTS

Byrd owned land that lay partly in the City (the City Tract) and partly in Darlington County. The property was part of what used to be Coker Farms, a National Historic Landmark

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases