Having granted petitioner's motion for an order declaring that the petition and respondent's amended answer raised no factual issues (see 22 NYCRR 806.5), we now find respondent guilty of the professional misconduct charged and specified in the petition. In violation of the disciplinary rules (see Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 [a] [4], [5], [7]; DR 6-101 [a] [3] [22 NYCRR 1200.3 (a) (4), (5), (7); 1200.30 (a) (3)]), respondent
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IN THE MATTER OF COFFIN
19 A.D.3d 994 (2005)
797 N.Y.S.2d 651
In the Matter of JAMES L. COFFIN, an Attorney, Respondent. COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS, Petitioner.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 30, 2005.
June 30, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.