1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 842 A.2d
  5. 842 A.2d 156 (2004)
 

LOZANO v. FRANK DELUCA CONSTRUCTION

842 A.2d 156 (2004)

178 N.J. 513

Porfirio A. LOZANO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FRANK DELUCA CONSTRUCTION, Respondent-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 10, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raquel Romero, Elizabeth, argued the cause for appellant (Ms. Romero, attorney; Stephen G. Marshall, on the brief).

David P. Kendall argued the cause for respondent (Francis T. Giuliano, Ramsey, attorney; Mr. Kendall and Mr. Giuliano, on the brief).

Justice ZAZZALI delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this workers' compensation case, we consider whether the phrase "recreational or social activities" as used in the Workers' Compensation Act encompasses activities that, although recreational or social in nature, are compelled by the employer.

While in the employ of a mason contractor, petitioner sustained an injury when he attempted to drive a go-cart on the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases