1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 864 A.2d
  5. 864 A.2d 133 (2004)
 

FORTI v. ASHCRAFT & GEREL

No. 03-CV-632.

864 A.2d 133 (2004)

Carol A. FORTI, Appellant, v. ASHCRAFT & GEREL, et al., Appellees.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided December 30, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carol A. Forti, pro se.

David P. Durbin, with whom Anjuma K. Goswami, Washington, DC, was on the brief, for appellees.

Before SCHWELB and FARRELL, Associate Judges, and BELSON, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM:

In this action for legal malpractice, the trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants after the plaintiff-appellant, herself an attorney, failed to meet repeated deadlines within which to name an expert witness and file a corresponding statement pursuant to Super. Ct. Civ. R. 26(b)(4). On appeal, the plaintiff does not dispute that expert testimony was necessary to prove legal malpractice by the defendants in conducting her underlying (and unsuccessful...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases