1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 361 S.C.
  5. 361 S.C. 634 (2004)
 

GLOVER v. COUNTY OF CHARLESTON

No. 25904.

361 S.C. 634 (2004)

606 S.E.2d 773

Joseph GLOVER, Emily Gaillard, Jewell G. Dangerfield, John S. Templeton, Charles Huff, Appellants, v. COUNTY OF CHARLESTON, County of Charleston Planning Commission, William Miller, in his individual and official capacity, Michelle Loy in her official Capacity as a member of the Charleston County Planning Commission, Defendants, of whom County of Charleston, County of Charleston Planning Commission are the, Respondents.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided December 6, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas R. Goldstein, of Belk, Cobb, Infinger & Goldstein, PA, of Charleston, for Appellants.

Joseph Dawson, III, and Bernard E. Ferrara, of North Charleston, for Respondents.

Justice WALLER:

Appellants,1 property owners in Charleston County, brought this action alleging the County's newly implemented Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) effectively re-zoned their property, depriving them of due process and equal protection, and resulting in a taking of their property without just compensation. The trial court granted summary judgment to respondents (collectively County). We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases