STATE v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO., L.P.

Nos. 2003 CA 1264, 2003 CA 1265.

897 So.2d 85 (2004)

The STATE of Louisiana, William Kimball, H.M. Kimball, Jr., and Elizabeth Kimball Lewis, Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Those Similarly Situated v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., et al. The State of Louisiana and XCL, Ltd., et al., Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Those Similarly Situated v. Wiltel, Inc., et al.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Order Granting Rehearing April 6, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Walters, Jr., Darrel J. Papillion, Baton Rouge, Kevin R. Duck, Lafayette, Counsel for 1st Appellants/Plaintiffs The Alexander Objectors.

Kenneth W. DeJean, Lafayette, Scott A. Powell, Don P. McKenna, Birmingham, AL, for 2nd Appellants/Plaintiffs The McCormick Objectors.

Michael R. Mangham, Dawn M. Fuqua, Donald J. Ethridge, Lafayette, Victor L. Marcello, Donald T. Carmouche, John H. Carmouche, Gonzales, Patrick W. Pendley, Allen J. Myles, Plaquemine, for Appellees/Plaintiffs William Kimball, H.M. Kimball, Jr., Elizabeth Kimball Lewis, Katherine McClelland Sibille, The Sibille Co., Inc., Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Those Similarly Situated.

Henry D. Salassi, Jr., John F. Olinde, Douglas L. Grundmeyer, Charles P. Blanchard, Keith C. Armstrong, New Orleans, for Appellees/Defendants The Settling Class Defendants Sprint Communications Co., L.P., et al.

Allen D. Darden, Baton Rouge, for Appellees/Defendants MCI Worldcom Network Services, Inc., et al.

Kenneth Pitre, Eunice, for Appellees/Objectors The Lurnest Fruge Heirs.

F. Gerald Maples, Pass Christian, MS, Timothy W. Porter, Jackson, MS, for Appellees/Objectors Russell W. and Wendy Amato.

L. Paul Foreman, Lake Charles, for Appellees/Objectors The J.R. Franks Objectors.

Before: CARTER, C.J., PARRO, GUIDRY, PETTIGREW, and GAIDRY, JJ.


CARTER, C.J.

This is an appeal from a district court judgment approving a class action settlement over the objection of certain class members. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In October of 1994, plaintiffs, the State of Louisiana ("State")1 and other landowners, filed two separate class action suits, which were thereafter consolidated, asserting the named defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases