1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 676 N.W.2d
  5. 676 N.W.2d 305 (2004)
 

STATE v. DAHL

No. A03-375.

676 N.W.2d 305 (2004)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Wayne Earl DAHL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 23, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Frederic W. Knaak, Knaak Kantrud, P.A., Fridley City Attorney, Vadnais Heights, MN, for respondent.

Randall D.B. Tigue, Randall Tigue Law Office, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, Presiding Judge; WILLIS, Judge; and WRIGHT, Judge.

OPINION

ROBERT H. SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellant Wayne Earl Dahl challenges his conviction of violating Fridley, Minn., City Code § 214.04.6 (2002), which prohibits the use of "motion signs" throughout Fridley.1 He argues the ordinance is facially unconstitutional under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. We conclude the ordinance is a valid time, place, or manner regulation under the test set out in

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases