1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 93 P.3d
  5. 93 P.3d 880 (2004)
 

CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. v. CENTRAL PUGET SOUND GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BD.

Nos. 52196-9-I, 52367-8-I.

93 P.3d 880 (2004)

CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., Appellant, v. CENTRAL PUGET SOUND GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BOARD, an agency of the State of Washington; Town of Woodway, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington; and Snohomish County, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington; Respondents, and City of Shoreline, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, Respondent. Snohomish County, Respondent, v. City of Shoreline, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, Appellant, Chevron U.S.A., Inc.; Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board, an agency of the State of Washington, Respondents, and Town of Woodway, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

Publication Ordered July 2, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew Sallas Lane, Snohomish County Atty. Office, Everett, for respondent County of Snohomish.

Scott Michael Missall, Thane D. Somerville, Seattle, for respondent Town of Woodway.

Peter J. Eglick, Connie K. Haslam, Michael P. Witek, Seattle, for appellant Chevron.

Ian Richard Sievers, Samuel Wilmore Plauche, City of Shoreline Atty., Shoreline, for respondent City of Shoreline.

Martha Patricia Lantz, Office of the Atty. Gen., Olympia, for respondent Central Puget Sound.

GROSSE, J.

RCW 36.70A.100 requires that a city's comprehensive plan be "coordinated with, and consistent with," those of adjacent cities. Here, the Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board (the Board) found that the Town of Woodway's comprehensive plan was inconsistent with the City of Shoreline's because each plan designated the same area of unincorporated land as a "potential annexation area." However, we can discern no reason in law or logic to conclude...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases