1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 374 F.3d
  5. 374 F.3d 554 (2004)
 

HUDSON v. CITY OF CHICAGO

No. 03-2690.

374 F.3d 554 (2004)

William HUDSON and Bishop Pamon, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided July 6, 2004.

Rehearing Denied August 13, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph V. Roddy (argued), Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Kerrie Maloney Laytin (argued), Office of the Corporation Counsel, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before BAUER, EASTERBROOK, and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs William Hudson and Bishop Pamon, former police officers with the Chicago Police Department, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Chicago. Hudson and Pamon claim that when the Department terminated their employment pursuant to an "absent without permission" ("AWOP") policy, the City (through the Department) failed to provide them with due process of law. The district court granted summary judgment to the City...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases