1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 388 F.3d
  5. 388 F.3d 539 (2004)
 

CASH v. HAMILTON COUNTY DEPT. OF ADULT

No. 03-3916.

388 F.3d 539 (2004)

Gerald CASH et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HAMILTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ADULT PROBATION et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: November 12, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Robert B. Newman, Cincinnati, OH, for Appellants. David Todd Stevenson, Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office, Cincinnati, OH, Richard Ganulin, City Solicitor's Office for the City of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Robert B. Newman, Stephen R. Felson, Cincinnati, OH, for Appellants. David Todd Stevenson, Susan M. Gertz, Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office, Cincinnati, OH, Richard Ganulin, City Solicitor's Office for the City of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, for Appellees.

Before: MERRITT, MOORE, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

GILMAN, Circuit Judge.

Homeless individuals in Cincinnati, Ohio brought suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the city and county, alleging that these entities had violated the plaintiffs' Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to the due process of law by destroying their personal property without notice and without any right to reclaim the items taken. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. For the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases