1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 839 A.2d
  5. 839 A.2d 83 (2004)
 

METLIFE AUTO AND HOME v. PALMER

839 A.2d 83 (2004)

365 N.J. Super. 293

METLIFE AUTO AND HOME, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Donald PALMER, Defendant, and Travelers Property Casualty Company, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 6, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward H. Keiper, Pennsauken, argued the cause for appellant (Alan P. Bruce, on the brief).

Michael A. Katz, Summit, argued the cause for respondent (Crawshaw, Mayfield, Turner, O'Mara, Donnelly & McBride, attorneys; Mr. Katz, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges KING, LINTNER and LISA.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LINTNER, J.A.D.

The issue to be decided in this appeal, not previously addressed in this State, is whether an insurance carrier providing specialty insurance for an antique automobile can avoid paying pro rata contribution under the anti-stacking provision, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1c, by excluding uninsured motorist (UM) coverage for injuries sustained by its insured while occupying an owned vehicle not insured by the antique...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases