1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 8 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 8 Cal.Rptr.3d 907 (2004)
 

KERTESZ v. OSTROVSKY

Nos. G030640, G031373.

8 Cal.Rptr.3d 907 (2004)

115 Cal.App.4th 369

Joseph J. KERTESZ et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Jerome E. OSTROVSKY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

January 28, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Michael G. York and Michael G. York, Newport Beach, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Law Offices of Ronald S. Cooper and Ronald S. Cooper, Costa Mesa, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

SILLS, P.J.

Joseph J. Kertesz and 12 other plaintiffs (appellants) appeal from the order dismissing their first amended complaint after Jerome E. Ostrovsky's (respondent) demurrer to that complaint was sustained without leave to amend. The lower court found appellants' complaint was barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. We conclude that the limitations period was tolled by respondent's petition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases