1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 87 P.3d
  5. 87 P.3d 827 (2004)
 

IN RE CLARK

No. SB-03-0113-D.

87 P.3d 827 (2004)

207 Ariz. 414

In the Matter of Richard E. CLARK, Attorney No. 9052, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

April 1, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard E. Clark, Scottsdale, Respondent Pro Se.

State Bar of Arizona, by Patricia A. Sallen, Bar Counsel, Phoenix, Attorney for State Bar of Arizona.

OPINION

McCREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, a hearing officer concluded that Richard E. Clark violated Rule 42 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona, Ethical Rule (ER) 8.4(c) (stating that it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to "engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation") and ER 8.4(d) (prohibiting lawyers from "engag[ing] in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases