1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 126 S.W.3d
  5. 126 S.W.3d 783 (2004)
 

SCHMITT v. STATE

No. ED 82527.

126 S.W.3d 783 (2004)

Conrad SCHMITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

February 3, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Loyce Hamilton, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Andrea Spillars, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Conrad Schmitt appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion. Schmitt's claim that post-conviction counsel abandoned him is without merit. Counsel timely filed an amended motion, and Schmitt was granted an evidentiary hearing on several of the claims therein. The fact that the motion's content was poor and failed to obtain relief does not amount to abandonment. See State v. Owsley, 959 S.W.2d 789

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases