1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 674 N.W.2d
  5. 674 N.W.2d 233 (2004)
 

INGRAM v. SYVERSON

No. A03-967.

674 N.W.2d 233 (2004)

Donna INGRAM, et al., Appellants, v. Selmer SYVERSON, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 3, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond L. Hansen, O'Brien & Wolf, L.L.P., Rochester, MN, for appellants.

Michael B. Goodman, Goodman & Guzinski, P.A., Rochester, MN, for respondents.

Considered and decided by TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge; KLAPHAKE, Judge; and G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

On appeal in this personal-injury case, appellants Donna Ingram and James Ingram argue that the district court erred in determining that their expert testimony was not based on adequate factual foundation, and in granting summary judgment because appellants failed to show their theory of causation was more probable than that of respondents. Because a physician's expert opinion may be reasonably based on information from multiple...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases