WOOTEN v. HEISLER

(AC 23290)

82 Conn. App. 815 (2004)

LAWRENCE WOOTEN v. ABRAM HEISLER

Court of Appeals of Connecticut.

Officially released May 11, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert C. Elfont filed a brief for the appellant (plaintiff).

Paul E. Pollock, for the appellee (defendant).

Lavery, C. J., and Schaller and Berdon, Js.


Opinion

LAVERY, C. J.

The plaintiff, Lawrence Wooten, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court on each of his three claims in favor of the defendant, Abram Heisler, his former attorney.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) applied the common-law doctrine of champerty and maintenance, (2) found that his claim violated the public policy promoted by the doctrine of champerty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases