PURNELL v. MARYLAND

No. CIV. RDB-02-3078.

330 F.Supp.2d 551 (2004)

Ruby PURNELL, Plaintiff, v. State of MARYLAND, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

March 18, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robin R. Cockey, Cockey Brennan and Maloney, Salisbury, MD, for Plaintiff.

Joseph P. Gill, Paul J. Cucuzzella, Office of the Attorney General, Annapolis, MD, for Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

BENNETT, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant State of Maryland's ("Defendant" or the "State") Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to Plaintiff Ruby Purnell's ("Plaintiff" or "Purnell") Complaint. The issues have been fully briefed by the parties, and oral argument is not necessary. See Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.2001). For the reasons set forth below, the Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases