1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 91 P.3d
  5. 91 P.3d 786 (2004)
 

MILLER v. BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGIST EXAMINERS

00-05; A119529.

91 P.3d 786 (2004)

193 Or. App. 715

Debra "Kali" MILLER, Ph.D., Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGIST EXAMINERS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 9, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles R. Williamson, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Kell, Alterman & Runstein, L.L.P.

Jas. Jeffrey Adams, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, DEITS, Chief Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge.

SCHUMAN, J.

After a contested case hearing, the Board of Psychologist Examiners (board) issued an order reprimanding petitioner, a licensee, and fining her $1,000 for continuing to provide psychotherapy to two minor children after their recently divorced father demanded that she stop. According to the board, that conduct violated petitioner's ethical duty to conduct therapy only with the informed permission of a person lawfully authorized to provide it. Petitioner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases