Petitioner's argument that the determination is not supported by substantial evidence is improperly raised for the first time on appeal, and we decline to consider it. So too is her argument that she is entitled to a new hearing because the unavailability of the hearing transcripts makes review of her claim impossible. Indeed, in the latter regard, petitioner took the opposite position before the IAS court, arguing that it could decide her CPLR
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IN THE MATTER OF WALLACE v. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD OF CITY OF NEW YORK
8 A.D.3d 78 (2004)
778 N.Y.S.2d 477
In the Matter of JOANNE WALLACE, Appellant, v. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK (DEPT. OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS), Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 10, 2004.
June 10, 2004.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
