1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 689 N.W.2d
  5. 689 N.W.2d 177 (2004)
 

STATE v. MILLER

No. A04-396.

689 N.W.2d 177 (2004)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Robert A. MILLER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 23, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, and James C. Backstrom, Dakota County Attorney, Helen R. Brosnahan, Assistant County Attorney, Hastings, MN, for respondent.

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, James R. Peterson, Assistant Public Defender, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

Considered and decided by SHUMAKER, Presiding Judge; LANSING, Judge; and FORSBERG, Judge.

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.*

Appellant challenges his conviction for felony DWI, arguing that, because the offense and license revocation dates for the oldest of the three offenses applicable under Minn.Stat. § 169A.24, subd. 1 (2002), were outside the statute's ten-year look-back period, the enhancement provision does not apply to him. Because the conviction date, which is within the ten-year look-back period, suffices for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases