1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 10 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 10 Cal.Rptr.3d 852 (2004)
 

CHAPMAN v. ENOS

No. A097943.

10 Cal.Rptr.3d 852 (2004)

116 Cal.App.4th 920

April CHAPMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Bruce ENOS et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

March 10, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Wagstaffe, San Francisco, Pamela Urueta, Timothy J. Fox, San Francisco, Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP, Gary Moss, Mary Patricia Hough, Moss & Hough, San Francisco, for Appellant.

Gail F. Flatt, Janis H. Grattan, Santa Rosa, Provencher & Flatt LLP, for Bruce Enos.

Michael D. Senneff, Bonnie A. Freeman, Santa Rosa, Senneff Freeman & Bluestone, LLP, for County of Sonoma.

RIVERA, J.

April Chapman (Chapman) appeals from a judgment upon a special verdict finding in favor of defendants Bruce Enos (Enos) and the County of Sonoma (County) on her causes of action for sexual harassment and retaliation. The pivotal issue for liability was whether the alleged harasser, Enos, was Chapman's supervisor. Chapman contends that the trial court erroneously modified the standard jury instruction on the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases