1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 8 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 8 Cal.Rptr.3d 833 (2004)
 

BLITZ v. FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC.

No. G031651.

8 Cal.Rptr.3d 833 (2004)

Robert BLITZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

Review Denied May 12, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barnes, Crosby, Fitzgerald & Zeman and William M. Crosby, Irvine, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Cooksey, Toolen, Gage, Duffy & Woog, Patrick J. Duffy, Costa Mesa, and Timothy D. Otte, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

BEDSWORTH, J.

Robert Blitz appeals from a summary judgment entered against him on his lawsuit asserting claims for fraud, violation of Labor Code section 970, and negligent misrepresentation, against Fluor Enterprises, Inc., his former employer. Blitz had alleged that Fluor induced him to leave a long-term relationship with another employer and move cross-country by promising him long-term rather than project-based employment, then revoked that offer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases