The record contradicts defendant's assertion that the court refused to consider the defense of intoxication. Prior to summations, the court expressly agreed to consider that defense, and it reviewed, among other things, medical records offered by defendant in an effort to substantiate it. Subsequently, in reaching a verdict, the court expressly concluded, as trier of fact, that the element of intent was not negated by intoxication. That conclusion is fully supported by the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
