1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 13 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 13 Cal.Rptr.3d 816 (2004)
 

NAVA v. MERCURY CAS. CO.

No. H026223.

13 Cal.Rptr.3d 816 (2004)

118 Cal.App.4th 803

Estanislao NAVA, Jr. et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

April 20, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walkup, Melodia, Kelly, Wecht & Schoenberger, Ronald H. Wecht, San Francisco, for Plaintiffs/Appellants.

Hager and Dowling, Jeffrey Lim, Lis Franklin, for Defendant/Respondent.

PREMO, J.

In this insurance coverage action, plaintiffs Estanislao Nava, Jr., Adrian Espitia, and Christopher Anthony Godoy appeal from a judgment that resulted after the trial court granted a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendant Mercury Casualty Company. They contend that the insurance policy in question is ambiguous and, as such, raises a triable issue whether it provides coverage.1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases