1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 366 F.3d
  5. 366 F.3d 461 (2004)
 

TART v. ILLINOIS POWER CO.

No. 03-2236.

366 F.3d 461 (2004)

Lamarce TART and David Curtis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY and Rauly Law, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided April 26, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley E. Goldstein, Eli Karsh (argued), Liberman, Goldstein & Associates, Clayton, MO, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Beth Clemens Boggs (argued), Landau, Omahana & Kopka, St. Louis, MO, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and BAUER and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge.

Lamarce Tart and David Curtis prevailed before a jury on their claims of race-based employment discrimination and retaliation. The district court subsequently granted the defendants' Rule 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law, vacating the jury's verdict. Once a jury has spoken, we are obliged to construe the facts in favor of the parties who prevailed under the verdict. Reeves...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases