1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 139 S.W.3d
  5. 139 S.W.3d 688 (2004)
 

HILL AND GRIFFITH CO. v. BRYANT

Nos. 12-03-00091-CV, 12-03-00092-CV.

139 S.W.3d 688 (2004)

The HILL AND GRIFFITH COMPANY, Adams & Coffey, P.C., and Pamela Neale Williams, Appellants, v. Lloyd BRYANT, C.V. Sessions, Jimmy Dell Wyatt, and Jimmie Harper, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler.

January 21, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wade C. Crosnoe, John Sepehri, Thompson Coe Cousins & Irons LLP, Dallas, for appellants The Hill and Griffith Company.

Thomas V. Murto, III, Stradley & Wright, Dallas, for appellants Adams & Coffey, P.C. and Pamela Neale Williams.

Richard I. Nemeroff, New York, NY, Lisa Renee Kivett, Kevin Duane McHargue, Baron & Budd, P.C., for appellees.

Panel consisted of WORTHEN, C.J., GRIFFITH, J. and DeVASTO, J.

OPINION

JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice.

Appellants Hill and Griffith Company ("H & G"), Adams & Coffey, P.C. ("Adams & Coffey"), attorneys of record for H & G, and Pamela Neale Williams ("Williams"), an Adams & Coffey shareholder, appeal an award of monetary and community service sanctions for discovery abuse. In three issues, H & G contends that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering it to pay $17,500.30 as a sanction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases