1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 21 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 21 Cal.Rptr.3d 791 (2004)
 

POCKET PROTECTORS v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO

No. C046247.

21 Cal.Rptr.3d 791 (2004)

124 Cal.App.4th 903

POCKET PROTECTORS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO et al., Defendants and Respondents; Regis Homes of Northern California, Inc., et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

Rehearing Denied January 3, 2005.

Review Denied March 30, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brandt-Hawley Law Group, Susan Brandt-Hawley, Glen Ellen, and Paige J. Swartley, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Samuel L. Jackson, Sacramento, and Joseph P. Cerullo, for Defendants and Respondents.

Remy, Thomas, Moose and Manley, Tina A. Thomas, Sacramento, and Sabrina V. Teller for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

SIMS, Acting P.J.

Plaintiff The Pocket Protectors, an unincorporated association, appeals from the denial of its petition for writ of mandamus under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res.Code, § 21000 et seq.; undesignated section references are to the Public Resources Code). The Pocket Protectors seek the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for a residential project called The Islands at Riverlake proposed by real party in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases