GRAYZEL v. ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.

No. CIV.A. 01-CV-3737JLL.

345 F.Supp.2d 466 (2004)

Joseph GRAYZEL, Plaintiff, v. ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC., St. Jude Medical, Daig Division, Inc., and St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

October 29, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York City, Barry Evans, John E. Daniel, and Jonathan S. Caplan, and Saiber Schlesinger Satz & Goldstein, LLC, Newark, NJ, Arnold B. Calmann, for Plaintiff.

Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Morgan Chu, Jonathan H. Steinberg, Andrei Iancu, and Richard G. Frenkel, and McCarter & English, LLP, Newark, NJ, Harvey C. Kaish, for Defendants.


OPINION & ORDER

LINARES, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendants St. Jude Medical, Inc.; St. Jude Medical, Daig Division, Inc.; and St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc., for summary judgment based on invalidity of claims 13, 14, and 16 of plaintiffs '960 patent. There was no oral argument. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. For the reasons set forth below, defendants' motion is GRANTED.

BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases