1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. B.R.
  4. 316 B.R.
  5. 316 B.R. 495 (2004)
 

IN RE PEN HOLDINGS, INC.

No. 302-00979. Adversary Nos. 304-0062; 304-0081; 304-0085; 304-0087; 304-0089; 304-0093; 304-0101; 304-0102; 304-0106; 304-0107; 304-0109; 304-0111; 304-0113; 304-0145; 304-0152; 304-0163; 304-0196; 304-0200; 304-0215; 304-0216; 304-0224; 304-0230; 304-0234.

316 B.R. 495 (2004)

In re PEN HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Debtors. The Elk Horn Coal Company, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Conveyor Manufacturing & Supply, Inc., et al., Defendants.

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee.

September 17, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barbara D. Holmes, David P. Canas & Tracy M. Lujon, Harwell Howard Hyne Gabbert & Manner PC, Nashville, TN, for The Elk Horn Coal Co.

Linda Knight, Gullett Sanford Robinson & Martin, Nashville, TN, for Conveyor Mfg. & Supply, Rish Equipment Co., Refab Co., Raocat Rubbert, Inc., Bill's Electronics, Inc., Camden Park, Inc., Baker Hughes Mining Tools, Inc., Highland Machinery Corp., J.H. Fletcher & Co., Keystone Mountaineer Power Systems, Inc., Cecil I. Walker Mfg. Co., Browning-Ferris Industries and Tema Systems, Inc.

Ronald G. Steen and Robert Goodrich, Jr., Stites & Harbison PLLC, Nashville, TN, for TransAmerica Equipment Financial Services.

Mare McNamee and David Thompson, Neal & Harwell, Nashville, TN, for R & R Contractors, Inc., Boarders & Hinkle Construction Co., Guyan Heavy Equipment, Young's Equipment, Inc. and Young's Equipment Repair, Inc.

Margaret Behm, Dodson Parker & Behm, Nashville, TN, for B & M Repair, Inc.

Robin White, Mendes & Gonzales PLLC, Nashville, TN, for Airgas-Mid America, Inc., Airgas-Mountain States, Inc., Cobre Tire Co. and Hanson Aggregates Davon, Inc.

David W. Houston, IV, Greenebaum Doll & McDonald PLLC, Nashville, TN, for Metalcraft Mining Equipment Rebuilders, Inc.

MEMORANDUM

KEITH M. LUNDIN, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue in these consolidated adversary proceedings on motions to dismiss and for summary judgment is whether the confirmed Chapter 11 plan preserved preference actions from the res judicata effect of confirmation. Provisions in the Joint Plan that reserved avoidance actions under 11 U.S.C. § 547 are minimally sufficient for purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 1123(b)(3).

FACTS

Pen Holdings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases