1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 361 S.C.
  5. 361 S.C. 442 (2004)
 

LINGARD v. CAROLINA BY-PRODUCTS

No. 3880.

361 S.C. 442 (2004)

605 S.E.2d 545

Herman LINGARD, Plaintiff, v. CAROLINA BY-PRODUCTS and Valley Proteins Company, Defendants, Randell Williams, Plaintiff, v. Carolina By-Products and Valley Proteins Company, Defendants, Of Whom Herman Lingard and Randell Williams are, Appellants, and Carolina By-Products is, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided October 25, 2004.

Rehearing Denied December 16, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chalmers C. Johnson, of Charleston, for Appellants.

G. Dana Sinkler, of Charleston, for Respondent.

ANDERSON, J.:

Two truck drivers, Herman Lingard and Randell Williams, were terminated after they were discovered at home rather than on their routes. Lingard and Williams brought suit against their employer on the basis of the progressive disciplinary policy found in their employee handbook. The circuit court determined the handbook did not constitute a contract, and even if it did, the employer fulfilled its obligations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases