1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 680 N.W.2d
  5. 680 N.W.2d 115 (2004)
 

HYATT v. ANOKA POLICE DEPT.

No. A03-1707.

680 N.W.2d 115 (2004)

Lena M. HYATT, Respondent, v. ANOKA POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted July 20, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert F. Mannella, Babcock, Neilson, Mannella, LaFleur & Klint, Anoka, MN, for respondent.

Paul D. Reuvers, Jason J. Kuboushek, Iverson Reuvers, LLC, Bloomington, MN, for appellants.

Considered and decided by RANDALL, Presiding Judge, KLAPHAKE, Judge, and FORSBERG, Judge.

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

After a police dog bit her during the arrest of her husband, respondent Lena M. Hyatt sued appellants, the Anoka Police Department and the City of Anoka (collectively referred to as the city), under the "dog bite" statute, Minn.Stat. § 347.22 (2002). The city moved for summary judgment, arguing that (1) the dog bite statute, which imposes strict liability upon the owner of a dog for injuries caused to a person, does not apply...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases