1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 22 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 22 Cal.Rptr.3d 772 (2004)
 

NASHA L.L.C. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

No. B167071.

22 Cal.Rptr.3d 772 (2004)

125 Cal.App.4th 470

NASHA L.L.C., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

December 29, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Luna & Glushon and Robert L. Glushon, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Rockard J. Delgadillo, City Attorney, Jeri L. Burge, Assistant City Attorney, and Steven N. Blau, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.

KLEIN, P.J.

Plaintiff and appellant Nasha L.L.C. (Nasha) appeals a judgment denying its petition for writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5),1 wherein Nasha sought to overturn an adverse decision by the South Valley Area Planning Commission (Planning Commission).2

The essential issue presented is whether the Planning Commission's decision should be set aside due to an unacceptable probability...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases