LIBERTY MUT. INS. CO. v. GRIESING

No. 03-03-00646-CV.

150 S.W.3d 640 (2004)

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Liberty Insurance Corporation, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, LM Insurance Corporation, and First Liberty Insurance Corporation, Appellants, v. Betty GRIESING, Individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.

August 26, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David P. Blanke, Spikes Kangerga, Vinson & Elkins, L.L.P., Austin, Russell Yager, David P. Henry, Vinson & Elkins, L.L.P., Dallas, for appellants.

Gavin H. McInnis, Michael G. Maloney, Maloney & Maloney, PC, San Antonio, D.J. Powers, Law Office of D.J. Powers, Austin, for appellee.

Before Chief Justice LAW, Justices PATTERSON and PURYEAR.


OPINION

W. KENNETH LAW, Chief Justice.

Appellee Betty Griesing sought a partial summary judgment to determine whether appellant Liberty Mutual may lawfully impose a state-mandated fee for theft prevention beyond the automobile insurance rates filed by Liberty Mutual and approved by the commissioner of insurance under a state regulatory regime. The district court granted partial summary judgment in favor of Griesing, declaring that the collection of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases