1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 343 F.Supp.2d
  5. 343 F.Supp.2d 429 (2004)
 

BARCLAY v. AMTRAK

No. Civ.A.03-CV-2450.

343 F.Supp.2d 429 (2004)

Robert A. BARCLAY, Plaintiff v. AMTRAK, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

November 8, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Barclay, Elkton, MD, pro se.

Thomas S. Bloom, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Pro se plaintiff Robert A. Barclay ("Barclay") filed a complaint against Amtrak on April 24, 2003, which, construed liberally, alleges: 1) disability discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 1201 et seq., the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq., and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act ("PHRA"), 43 Pa.C.S...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases