1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 148 S.W.3d
  5. 148 S.W.3d 624 (2004)
 

SLOTT v. STATE

Nos. 14-02-01294-CR, 14-02-01295-CR, 14-02-01296-CR, 14-02-01297-CR.

148 S.W.3d 624 (2004)

Mark Anthony SLOTT, Thurmond W. Gentry, and Capitol Electroplating, Inc., Appellants v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).

October 12, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward M. Chernoff and Dane Michael Johnson, Houston, for appellants.

Roger A. Haseman, Houston, for appellees.

Panel consists of Chief Justice HEDGES and Justices FOWLER and GUZMAN.

OPINION

EVA M. GUZMAN, Justice.

In this appeal, we examine whether an offense under Chapter 7 of the Texas Water Code occurred within the limitations period and whether the State presented sufficient evidence to support appellants' convictions pursuant to that Chapter. We also examine whether the jury was correctly charged regarding the State's burden of proof.

Appellants Mark Anthony Slott ("Slott"), Thurmond W. Gentry, ("Gentry") and Capitol Electroplating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases