JANIK v. RUDY, EXELROD & ZIEFF

No. A102513.

14 Cal.Rptr.3d 751 (2004)

119 Cal.App.4th 930

Stanley JANIK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RUDY, EXELROD & ZIEFF et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing July 22, 2004.

Review Denied October 13, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lakeshore Law Center, Jeffrey Wilens, Yorba Linda, CA, Counsel for plaintiff and appellant.

Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney, Michael P. Bradley, San Francisco, CA, Counsel for defendants and respondents.


POLLAK, J.

Plaintiff seeks to impose liability on attorneys who produced a class action recovery of some $90 million, claiming they were negligent because they failed to obtain a still larger recovery. While we may share the attorneys' dismay that their efforts have been rewarded with this lawsuit rather than with the kudos they no doubt expected, and perhaps deserve, we are nonetheless constrained to hold that plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases