AKE v. SAIF

01-06272, A120356.

87 P.3d 673 (2004)

192 Or. App. 617

In the Matter of the Compensation of Lori I. Ake, Claimant. Lori I. AKE, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Binary Technologies, Inc., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 31, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Bailey, III, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Daniel M. Spencer LLC.

Jerome P. Larkin argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and ORTEGA, Judges.


LINDER, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board (board) in which the board concluded, inter alia, that she is not entitled to a hearing on the merits of her aggravation claim because she failed to perfect that claim as required by ORS 656.273(3). Claimant assigns error to that ruling, arguing that, because SAIF denied her aggravation claim on the merits, the issue of whether she perfected her claim is moot. In the alternative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases