PORRO v. PORRO

No. A03-1086.

675 N.W.2d 82 (2004)

In re the Marriage of Robert PORRO, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Rhonda PORRO, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 24, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Lengeling, Richard Rhinehart & Associates, LLP, Sioux City, Iowa, for appellant.

Rhonda Porro, Woodbury, MN, pro se respondent.

Considered and decided by ANDERSON, Presiding Judge; KLAPHAKE, Judge; and WILLIS, Judge.


OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

Appellant-father appeals from a child-support magistrate's order modifying a child-support order issued in Massachusetts. Father argues that, under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, Minnesota courts lacked subject-matter jurisdiction either to enforce or to modify the Massachusetts order. Because we agree that the magistrate lacked jurisdiction to modify the order, we vacate the magistrate's order.

FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases